In financial reporting, using a prior period adjustment account might seem like an easy fix to reconcile discrepancies from earlier periods. However, in tax reporting, this approach creates significant issues, especially when it comes to the proper roll-forward of retained earnings. Instead of using a prior period adjustment account to deal with unaccounted differences, adjustments should be handled through current year (CY) distributions or contributions, unless they can be directly attributed to an income or expense item.
In tax reporting, retained earnings must roll forward properly from year to year to ensure consistency between the tax return and the financial statements. Retained earnings for any given year follow the formula:
Beginning Retained Earnings (from the prior tax return) +/– CY Income +/– Distributions/Contributions = Ending Retained Earnings.
When you use a prior period adjustment account to address unaccounted differences and post it directly to retained earnings, it effectively restates the beginning retained earnings balance, which creates discrepancies. This restatement bypasses the income statement and prevents the proper roll-forward of retained earnings from the prior tax return, leaving the tax filings misaligned with the financials.
Posting prior period adjustments directly to retained earnings can be equivalent to "hiding" adjustments. Retained earnings should reflect accumulated earnings, adjusted only through income, expense, distributions, or contributions. Direct adjustments distort this by artificially altering retained earnings, which should always reconcile from the prior year's ending balance.
The right approach is to handle any discrepancies that arise by running them through the current year’s distributions or contributions unless the adjustment can be tied to a clear income or expense discrepancy. This preserves the integrity of retained earnings, ensures they close properly, and allows the figures to roll forward accurately on both tax and financial statements.
While prior period adjustments might be used in financial reporting under strict conditions—usually for material misstatements—this doesn’t translate well to tax reporting. Tax returns depend on the consistent, accurate carry-forward of retained earnings, and prior period adjustments should not be used to reconcile discrepancies unless they meet specific, narrow criteria.
If you identify a discrepancy from a previous period that is tied to an income or expense difference, this should ideally be handled through an amended tax return for the prior year. Using a prior period adjustment in the current year instead of amending the return can lead to reporting discrepancies and potential scrutiny from tax authorities. Tax returns need to clearly reflect any corrections through the proper period, not lumped into current year adjustments.
For tax purposes, Schedule M-2 tracks retained earnings from the beginning to the end of the year. It’s tempting to use the "Other Increases" or "Other Decreases" lines to accommodate these adjustments, but this should be avoided in most cases. These entries don’t tie back to the income statement and bypass the intended flow of financial data. When used improperly, they can create discrepancies between your financial statements and tax returns, leading to red flags during audits or reviews.
Schedule M-2 is meant to provide a clear reconciliation of retained earnings, and using these lines for adjustments not clearly tied to income or equity entries distorts the tax filing. Misuse of these lines can create the appearance of “phantom” increases or decreases in equity that don’t match up with any actual economic activity or business event.
The best way to handle unaccounted differences, especially those not directly attributable to income or expense discrepancies, is by running them through current year distributions or contributions. This approach ensures that the adjustment is reflected accurately in the equity section of the balance sheet and that retained earnings roll forward properly. Since distributions and contributions close to retained earnings at year-end, they keep the financial statements and tax return aligned.
When you post the adjustment through these equity accounts, it prevents artificial inflation or deflation of current year income, ensuring that the tax return reflects true financial performance and that retained earnings are correctly stated.
If you are attempting to bypass earlier financial statement discrepancies by using income or expense accounts for prior period adjustments, then the correct course of action is to amend the prior year’s tax return. The IRS expects consistency between what is reported in each tax year, so prior year discrepancies need to be corrected at their source. Simply calling it a prior period adjustment in the current year is not sufficient and could result in reporting errors that might trigger audits or penalties.
Amending the return ensures that the correction is properly documented, that retained earnings remain consistent, and that there is a clear paper trail of the adjustment.
Using prior period adjustment accounts in tax reporting is generally not appropriate, especially if it involves posting directly to retained earnings. In most cases, adjustments should be handled through current year distributions or contributions to ensure that retained earnings roll forward properly and consistently with tax regulations. Schedule M-2 should not be misused to accommodate these adjustments, as it can lead to discrepancies in both financial and tax reporting.
If adjustments are tied to previous years' discrepancies that affect income or expense, amending the prior year’s return is the correct approach. By following these best practices, you can ensure accurate tax filings, maintain the integrity of retained earnings, and avoid potential audit risks.
Thank you for subscribing.
© 2020 AJB & Associates LLC | firm@ajbcpas.net | Privacy Policy | Sitemap